sa-poster

In recent years Roland Emmerich has been the king of destruction on a worldwide scale with films like “The Day After Tomorrow”,  “2012” and “Independence Day” (now – bizarrely and to my view unwisely – with two sequels on the roadmap). This time though, with “San Andreas”, it is Brad Peyton who takes the helm in a mass orgy of destruction on the US west coast.

Dwayne (“The Rock”) Johnson plays Ray, a Fire & Rescue helicopter pilot whose skill and coolness are illustrated through a daring opening rescue.

Ray, about to hit Rock bottom
Ray, about to hit Rock bottom

But despite the joy from the regular rescuing of stupid people in perilous situations, Ray’s life isn’t all a bed of roses. For reasons of past tragedy, he is separating from his wife (Carla Gugino) and to rub salt into the wound her new beau – architect Daniel Riddick (Ioan Gruffudd) – has the temerity to step into his fatherly role of transporting his daughter Blake (Alexandra Daddario) to college in San Francisco.

They all agreed that putting piranhas in the jacuzzi had been a really bad idea
They all agreed that putting piranhas in the jacuzzi had been a really bad idea

Meanwhile the excellent Paul Giamatti plays an expert seismologist who, with just astonishing – and some might say unbelievable – timing, discovers the Holy Grail for detecting earthquakes the very moment that a severe earthquake rocks Nevada! But that is just the start of the problems as the whole of the San Andreas fault opens up and disaster looms for the whole Western seaboard with – you’ve guessed it – San Francisco forecast to bear the brunt of the devastation. The scene is set for Ray to pursue a desperate mission to save his family.

There is a major fault in this movie, as reflected in the title. Unfortunately, that is not the only fault visible.     

OK, it was bad... but on the plus side, at last there was a solution to California's landfill problem.
OK, it was bad… but on the plus side, at last there was a solution to California’s landfill problem.

The early seventies were the golden age for the disaster movie genre, led by producer Irwin Allen with the classic “The Poseidon Adventure” in 1972 and “The Towering Inferno” two years later. I was pre-teen at the time and just adored these films. Where they worked so well (for the better ones anyway) was in putting a completely disparate group of people together, each with their own back-story, secrets and sins, and watching the drama play out as the disaster involving capsize/fire/earthquake/meteor/killer bees (delete as applicable) proceeded. What “San Andreas” visibly lacks is this sense of ‘will they/won’t they’ (die that is), since there are so few main characters available to be potentially bumped off. Granted that young Blake, with her true hotness amply illustrated through an early gratuitous poolside scene, picks up a prospective boyfriend and his younger brother in San Francisco to up the potential body count.  However you know that the arc of the story, and the likely prospect of a ‘Hollywood ending’, is bound to limit the carnage. And this effectively pours a tsunami worth of cold water onto the tension.

Just what California doesn't need... "water water everywhere, but not a drop to drink"
Just what California doesn’t need… “water water everywhere, but not a drop to drink”

The other major problem I had was with the 3D. I’m not a great fan, but had to admit that the effects used in the opening scenes of the film were pretty good and added to the excitement. However 3D effects always leave me feeling that the action seems – ironically – LESS real than in 2D, and this really strikes home when the wall-to-wall CGI of mass destruction arrives. To me it just looks insanely false, as typified in an early scene (no spoiler) involving lots and lots of water. It would actually be interesting to see a 2D cut to see whether it was the CGI that was bad or just the CGI in 3D.

The city's glaziers hadn't had so much business since Iron Man and Hulk were last in town.
The city’s glaziers hadn’t had so much business since Iron Man and Hulk were last in town.

Dwayne Johnson, although not having the most dynamic of dialogue to deliver, actually does a creditable acting job. Most of the rest of the cast seem to be sleepwalking through their roles, including a strangely irrelevant cameo from Kylie Minogue. Will Yun Lee is good as Giamatti’s brilliant young colleague. But the British actress  Archie Panjabi (excellent as Kalinda from “The Good Wife”) seems to be completely wasted in a nothingness role of a TV news reporter.

Giamatti and Panjabi:  both regretting they hadn't gone for the next range up at IKEA
Giamatti and Panjabi: both regretting they hadn’t gone for the next range up at IKEA

All in all, the earth didn’t move for me with this flick.  

Fad Rating:  FFf.

By bobwp

Dr Bob Mann lives in Hampshire in the UK. Now retired from his job as an IT professional, he is owner of One Mann's Movies and an enthusiastic reviewer of movies as "Bob the Movie Man". Bob is also a regular film reviewer on BBC Radio Solent.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] #2 – San Andreas […]

Farlapton
Farlapton
8 years ago

Just want to say I love your humorous comments below the photos. Thanks.

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x