A One Mann’s Movies review of “The Mule” (2019).

Bob the Movie Man’s Rating:

Certification:

UK: 15; US: R.

It’s delightful to see Clint Eastwood back in front of the camera on the big screen.  His last starring film was “Trouble with the Curve” in 2012 – a baseball-themed film that I don’t remember coming out in the UK, let alone remember seeing. Before that was 2008’s excellent “Gran Torino”.

Based on a true story.

“The Mule” is based on a true New York Times story about Leo Sharp, a veteren recruited by a cartel to ship drugs from the southern border to Chicago.

Eastwood couldn’t cast Sharp in the movie as himself because he died back in 2016, so had to personally take the role. (This is #satire…. Eastwood’s last film was the terrible “The 15:17 to Paris” where his ‘actors’ were the real-life participants themselves: you won’t find a review on this site as I only review films I’ve managed to sit through…. and with this one I failed!).

So not delivering dirty laundry then? On completion of Earl’s first run he finds more in the envelope than he envisaged. (Source: Warner Brothers).

The plot.

Eastwood plays Earl Stone, a self-centred horticulturist of award-winning daylily’s (whatever they are) who is estranged from wife Mary (Dianne Wiest) and especially from his daughter Iris (Alison Eastwood, Clint’s own daughter), who now refuses to speak to him. This is because Earl has let his family down at every turn. The only person willing to give him a chance is his grand-daughter Ginny (Taissa Farmiga, younger sister of Vera). With his affairs in financial freefall, a chance meeting at a wedding leads Earl into a money-making driving job for the cartel operated by Laton (Andy Garcia). (Laton doesn’t seem to have a first name….. Fernando perhaps?).

With has beat-up truck and aged manner, he is invisible to the cops and so highly effective in the role. Even when – as the money keeps rolling in – he upgrades his truck to a souped-up monster!

Butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth would it officer? (Source: Warner Brothers).

Loose Morals.

It’s difficult to know whether Eastwood is playing a hero or an anti-hero. You feel tense when Earl is at risk of being caught, but then again the law officers would be preventing hundreds of kilos of cocaine from reaching the streets of Chicago and through their actions saving the lives of probably hundreds of people. I felt utterly conflicted: the blood of those people, and the destruction of the families that addiction causes, was on Earl’s hands as much as his employer’s. But you can’t quite equate that to the affable old-man that Eastwood portrays, who uses much of the money for charitable good-works in his community.

Like father like daughter. The acting dynasty of Clint and Mary. (Source: Warner Brothers).

Family values.

In parallel with the drug-running main plot is a tale of Earl’s attempted redemption: “family should always come first”. When the two storylines come together around a critical event then it feels like a sufficient trigger for Earl to turn his back on his life of selfishness. This also gives room for some splendid acting scenes between Eastwood and Wiest. It’s also interesting that Earl tries to teach the younger DEA enforcement agent not to follow in the sins of his past. Bradley Cooper, back in pretty-boy mode, plays the agent, but seemed to me to be coasting; to me he wasn’t convincing in the role.  Michael Peña is better as his unnamed DEA-buddy. 

Earl (Clint Eastwood) and Mary (Dianne Wiest) sharing a civil moment. (Source: Warner Brothers).

Final thoughts.

The showing at my cinema was surprisingly well-attended for a Wednesday night, showing that Eastwood is still a star-draw for box-office even in his old age. And it’s the reason to see the film for sure. His gristled driving turn to camera (most fully seen in the trailer rather than the final cut) is extraordinary.

A brilliant gristled glare to camera that’s difficult to beat. (Source: Warner Brothers).

He even manages to turn in an “eyes in rearview-mirror” shot that is surely a tribute to his Dirty Harry days!

If you can park your moral compass for a few hours then its an enjoyable film of drug-running and redemption. I’d like to suggest it also illustrates that crime really doesn’t pay, but from the end titles scene I’m not even sure at that age if that even applies! 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Moody
5 years ago

First off, “The 15:17 to Paris” was a great film let down by terrible acting, but absolutely watchable because the actors actually did what you see on the screen. #unbelievable Now for The Mule. . . I watched it last week and enjoyed it a lot (as I did Gran Torino). But, I must say, Clint did seem to struggle to me a little – his age has caught up with him. And the same goes for Dianne West. There were s couple of moments of acting interplay between them that didn’t work for me. And at the end, I… Read more »

trackback

[…] Movie review on One mann’s movies […]

Trailer

The trailer is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_QksSzK7sI .

By bobwp

Dr Bob Mann lives in Hampshire in the UK. Now retired from his job as an IT professional, he is owner of One Mann's Movies and an enthusiastic reviewer of movies as "Bob the Movie Man". Bob is also a regular film reviewer on BBC Radio Solent.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Moody
5 years ago

First off, “The 15:17 to Paris” was a great film let down by terrible acting, but absolutely watchable because the actors actually did what you see on the screen. #unbelievable Now for The Mule. . . I watched it last week and enjoyed it a lot (as I did Gran Torino). But, I must say, Clint did seem to struggle to me a little – his age has caught up with him. And the same goes for Dianne West. There were s couple of moments of acting interplay between them that didn’t work for me. And at the end, I… Read more »

trackback

[…] Movie review on One mann’s movies […]

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x